Home » Flexible Packaging Sustainability » Eco-modulation of EPR fees

Eco-modulation of EPR fees under PPWR

Eco-modulation means the contribution a producer pays under extended producer responsibility varies with how the packaging is designed. Better design, lower fee.

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 makes that link mandatory and ties it to the recyclability performance grade. It harmonises the criteria across the Union. It does not set the amounts, and it does not give a start date.

This page sets out which article creates the obligation and what triggers it. It also sets out what is harmonised, what stays national, and what a producer can plan on before the delegated acts exist.

What eco-modulation is, and what it is not

Extended producer responsibility makes the producer finance the collection, sorting and recycling of the packaging it places on a market. Eco-modulation adjusts that contribution according to a design characteristic. Packaging that is easier to recover costs less to put on the market.

Several Member States already modulate fees on their own criteria. Recital 35 names that as the problem it is solving: national initiatives create regulatory uncertainty for operators supplying packaging in several Member States.

Eco-modulation is not a tax, not a penalty and not a new obligation on top of EPR. It is the pricing rule inside a scheme that already exists. What PPWR changes is the criterion on which that pricing runs.

The article that creates the obligation

The mandatory link between the grade and the fee is in Article 6(8). Contributions paid by producers under Article 45 shall be modulated in accordance with the recyclability performance grades.

The rules that will govern how are in Article 6(4)(d). The delegated acts due by 1 January 2028 must establish a framework for that modulation, alongside the design-for-recycling criteria and the grades themselves.

Article 45 is where extended producer responsibility itself sits. It is not where eco-modulation is defined, which is a common misreading. The grades are set out on the PPWR recyclability grades page: grade A from 95 %, grade B from 80 %, grade C from 70 %.

Why eco-modulation has no start date yet

Article 6(8) does not name a year. It names a sequence.

1 Jan 2028Deadline for the delegated acts under Article 6(4), which include the modulation framework.
+18 monthsCounted from the entry into force of those delegated acts and of the implementing acts under Article 6(5). Then modulation applies.
1 Jan 2030Grade C becomes the minimum for market access, or 24 months after the delegated acts, whichever is later.
1 Jan 2038Only grades A and B may be placed on the market.

The 18 months run from entry into force, not from the adoption deadline, and the clock needs both instruments. Any specific year quoted for eco-modulation is a planning assumption, not a statutory date.

That distinction matters commercially. A date presented as law in a supplier document or a tender response is a claim that cannot be substantiated from the regulation text.

Two modulations, one mandatory and one optional

The regulation contains two different modulation mechanisms. They are frequently merged into one.

Mandatory: the recyclability gradeArticle 6(8). Contributions shall be modulated in accordance with the recyclability performance grades, on the framework set in the delegated acts.
Optional: recycled contentArticle 7(7). Contributions may be modulated on the percentage of recycled content. Any such modulation must take into account the sustainability criteria of the recycling technologies and the environmental costs.
National: further criteriaRecital 129. Member States may keep using criteria such as recycled content, reusability or the presence of hazardous substances under Directive 2008/98/EC.

A single pack can therefore be modulated on more than one axis at once. Only the first axis will be the same in every Member State. The recycled-content targets are covered on the recycled content under Article 7 page.

What extended producer responsibility covers

Article 45(1) attaches the responsibility to the producer for packaging made available on the territory of a Member State for the first time. It also covers packaging unpacked by someone who is not the end user.

Article 45(2) adds two cost categories on top of those already in Article 8a(4)(a) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

  • The cost of labelling waste receptacles for packaging waste collection under Article 13.
  • The cost of compositional surveys of collected mixed municipal waste.

Those costs must be established in a transparent, proportional, non-discriminatory and efficient way.

Article 45(3) requires an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility in every Member State where a producer makes packaging available for the first time from outside that Member State. Registration is separate again. Under Article 44(2), producers register in the national register of each Member State where they place packaging.

Recital 128 settles the relationship between the two instruments. For extended producer responsibility, PPWR is lex specialis in relation to Directive 2008/98/EC. Its provisions prevail where the two conflict, including on fee modulation, registration and reporting.

The criteria are harmonised, the amounts are not

Recital 35 is explicit about the limit of the exercise. The Commission is empowered to harmonise the criteria for modulating fees, based on the recyclability performance grade, while not setting the actual amounts of such fees.

Harmonised across the UnionThe recyclability performance grade, the assessment method behind it, and the framework on which contributions are modulated.
Decided in each Member StateThe scheme, the registration, the tariff, and the amount that ends up on the invoice.

After eco-modulation applies, the same structure will carry the same grade in every Member State and a different price in each one. The assessment converges. The invoice does not.

For a brand selling in six markets, that means one recyclability file and six national contributions. Each is calculated by its own scheme, on its own tariff. What PPWR changes is that the design characteristic driving the discount stops being six different things.

It also means no supplier can quote a cost saving in euros for a design change. The direction of the effect is knowable. The amount is not. How the two frameworks meet is set out on the PPWR and EPR page.

What a producer can do before the delegated acts

Four things are actionable now. None of them depends on the acts being published.

  1. Establish where each structure sits today. Not a PPWR grade, which cannot be issued yet, but an assessment against the current industry references. That assessment is what the future grade will be built on.
  2. Identify the structures that fail on a single feature. A pack held below a grade by one component is a cheaper redesign than a pack that fails on several.
  3. Map the markets. Registration, authorised representatives and contributions are per Member State. A portfolio review that ignores the market list is incomplete.
  4. Collect the supplier documentation. Article 16 requires suppliers to pass on the information the manufacturer needs to demonstrate conformity. Assembling it before a deadline is cheaper than assembling it under one.

The design levers that actually move a recyclability assessment are covered on the design for recycling page.

Frequently asked questions

When does eco-modulation start to apply?

The regulation gives no calendar date. Article 6(8) sets the trigger at 18 months from the entry into force of the delegated acts under Article 6(4) and the implementing acts under Article 6(5). The delegated acts are due by 1 January 2028, so any specific year is a planning assumption rather than a legal deadline.

Is eco-modulation based on the recyclability grade or on recycled content?

On the grade, mandatorily, under Article 6(8). Modulation on recycled content is a separate and optional mechanism under Article 7(7). Member States may add further criteria such as reusability or the presence of hazardous substances.

Does eco-modulation set the amount a producer pays?

No. Recital 35 states that the harmonised criteria are established while not setting the actual amounts of the fees. Tariffs remain a matter for each national scheme. The same packaging can carry one grade across the Union and a different contribution in every Member State.

Who pays the modulated contribution?

The producer, defined in Article 45(1) as the party making the packaging available on the territory of a Member State for the first time, or unpacking it without being the end user. A producer established elsewhere must appoint an authorised representative under Article 45(3).

Does a UK packaging EPR registration cover the EU obligation?

No. The UK scheme sits outside the PPWR framework and does not discharge an obligation arising in a Member State. Packaging placed on the EU market is registered and contributed for under the scheme of each Member State concerned.

Sources

Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Articles 6(4), 6(8), 7(7), 13, 16, 44 and 45, Annex II Table 3, and recitals 28, 35, 128 and 129. Directive 2008/98/EC, Articles 8 and 8a, for the general extended producer responsibility framework on which PPWR operates as lex specialis. Every article reference on this page was checked against the consolidated regulation text rather than secondary sources.

PPWR and EPRHow the two frameworks connect, and who counts as the producer.→ Read the guide
PPWR recyclability gradesThe three grades of Annex II, Table 3, and the thresholds behind them.→ See the grades
Recycled content under Article 7Targets per plastic part, and the optional modulation at Article 7(7).→ See the targets
Design for recyclingThe levers that move an assessment: EN 18120, RecyClass, CEFLEX.→ Read the guide
PPWR declaration of conformityArticle 39 and Annex VIII, with the technical documentation behind it.→ See the requirements
The mono-material transitionMoving a live portfolio in four phases, with the calendar behind it.→ Read the guide
The structure can be assessed today. The PPWR grade, after the delegated acts.

If your packaging is built on VLM Poliplast structures, the documentation behind it comes with the supply, per structure: technical data sheets and material declarations. Article 16 PPWR requires suppliers to provide the compliance information a manufacturer needs to demonstrate conformity.

Recyclability assessments on the current industry reference frameworks are supplied alongside it, as engineering data rather than a consultancy service. No PPWR grade and no fee figure is claimed for any structure before the delegated acts are adopted.

Contact our technical team